THE_NEW_RULES

GitHub's Stranglehold: Healthy Ecosystem or Dangerous Monopoly?

Chapter 6: Platform Dynamics

"GitHub won not by being better, but by being where everyone already was. Network effects, not features, determine platform winners. GitLab learned this lesson at a cost of $12 billion."

The book presents GitHub's dominance as inevitable, even natural. But should we accept this monopoly, or is the concentration of all open source in one company's hands an existential risk?

Questions for Debate:

The Monopoly Reality

  • Is GitHub's control over open source development healthy or dangerous?
  • What happens when Microsoft decides to change GitHub's direction?
  • Are we too dependent on a single platform for critical infrastructure?

The Alternative Impossibility

  • Why do technically superior alternatives (GitLab, Gitea) fail?
  • Is it actually impossible to compete with network effects?
  • What would it take to break GitHub's monopoly?

The Lock-in Acceptance

  • Have we just given up on platform diversity?
  • Is fighting monopolies pointless in the network effect age?
  • Should we optimize for working within monopolies instead of fighting them?

Share Your Experience:

The GitHub Dependents:

  • What would happen to your projects if GitHub disappeared tomorrow?
  • Have you tried alternatives? What made you come back?
  • What GitHub lock-in do you accept vs. resist?

The Platform Refugees:

  • If you've successfully moved off GitHub, how did you do it?
  • What did you gain and lose by choosing alternatives?
  • Was the freedom worth the network effect loss?

The Systemic Issues:

The Innovation Suppression:

  • Does GitHub's dominance prevent innovation in version control?
  • Are we stuck with pull requests forever because GitHub defined them?
  • What improvements are impossible because GitHub won't build them?

The Cultural Hegemony:

  • Has GitHub's workflow become the only accepted way to develop?
  • Are different development philosophies being extinguished?
  • Is open source now defined by what works on GitHub?

The Economic Extraction:

  • How much value does Microsoft extract from controlling GitHub?
  • Are we providing free training data for Copilot?
  • Who really benefits from open source centralization?

The Resistance Strategies:

For Projects:

  • Should important projects maintain mirrors on alternative platforms?
  • Is platform diversification worth the complexity?
  • How do you balance reach with independence?

For Companies:

  • Should businesses rely on GitHub for critical infrastructure?
  • What's the real cost of platform lock-in?
  • When does convenience become dangerous dependency?

The Future Scenarios:

The Optimistic View:

  • Maybe monopolies are efficient and beneficial
  • Perhaps GitHub's dominance enables innovation elsewhere
  • Could centralization actually improve open source?

The Pessimistic View:

  • GitHub becomes increasingly extractive
  • Microsoft uses position to advantage Azure/VS Code
  • Open source becomes corporate controlled

The Realistic View:

  • Are we past the point of no return?
  • Is this just how platforms work now?
  • Should we accept and adapt rather than resist?

Your Take:

Is GitHub's monopoly a feature or a bug of modern development?

What would have to happen for you to leave GitHub?

Loading comments...